Google Copied My Ideas

I have been writing search articles since November 2006 and as a search engineer it helps me to construct my thoughts and focus on my work. I was never really under the impression that anybody in industry paid a huge amount of attention to my thinking though – maybe they still don’t – but I appear to have predicted many of the features of Google’s new experimental search in quite some elaborate detail.

See results on a timeline or map. With the timeline and map views, Google’s technology extracts key dates and locations from select search results so you can view the information in a different dimension.

Timeline and map views work best for searches related to people, companies, events and places.

You can find the opinion at other levels as well though, and this is where the power comes in in terms of really targeting what the user is looking for quickly and efficiently. All the following mean that this is the first true example of social search:

  • Find the opinion over a range of dates, good for current events, modern history, changes in trends.

The text in black is from Google’s experimental ‘Timeline and map views’ search, the text in blue is from this article published February 19th, 2007. I was talking about a semantic implementation used to search through results by a timeframe instead of a straight relevance search. You can even narrow down date ranges by clicking on the timeline to select an era.

Spooky eh? I don’t think anyone else predicted that.

I hear you though, that’s just one example and I got lucky, so lets see… what else did I talk about in the same article?

Narrow Search

  • When you begin a search, you enter just one or two keywords in the topic you’re interested in.
  • Related keywords appear, which you can then select from to target your search and remove any doubts about dual meanings of a word for example.

narrow search from Google

The image above is from Google’s brand spanking new ‘Left-hand search navigation‘. Look at the white box (I’ve faded the rest out for clarity) and there you have it, exactly the feature I was talking about in all its living glory.

So what about the other features of Google’s new experimental search? Right hand search navigation… oh hang on that’s just the left hand navigation on the… urr… right side. Revolutionary. There’s also keyboard shortcuts! Oh hang on I just did a Ctrl-S.

In fact all the ‘new’ features of Google’s experimental search are ones I wrote about developing back in February and this I find slightly irritating for a few reasons:

  1. It’s very unlikely that they saw my work and copied it. The main worry for me is that they still can’t come up with anything new even in what they call experimental search and that’s what bothers me about a company with so many PhDs. Why don’t they just give me a job? And yes, I am bitter 🙂
  2. They are afraid to push the boundaries. For instance in my article I write about some ideas far more experimental than these, but they’ve not got anything exciting or new in there. I want to see the things that happen in the Googleplex, and then get binned for being too radical or wacky. I want to see never mind

Again, Google copying me is hugely unlikely, this I’m sure is a coincidence. However, a coincidence that should never happen. I’m one person developing search technology with no PhD and heck I never even finished my degree I just cram programming languages into my brain and think of crazy ideas until they form into something I can use.

They have all the intelligence in one building, you have no idea what I’d give to use that kind of working environment and the batsh*t insane ideas we’d make a reality.


8 Comments on “Google Copied My Ideas”

  1. Haniff Din says:

    To be honest these kinds of features can be seen on many other search engines already – so I don’t think anyone has or can claim monopoly on these ideas.
    I can clearly recall when google started, they copied everything altavista did, including leeching their content/links. So like Microsoft Google are guilty of leeching ideas – it’s just how it works. The trick is be the first to make money out of them or make them into a well known brand. Otherwise It’s sour grapes. I wish I had one pound for every idea someone stole from me. I’d be richer than google! It’s clearly far easier just to steal ideas isn’t it?

  2. Phill says:

    Totally dead on, as I say in the article though – I don’t think they stole em. What actually annoys me is the lack of innovation from Google!

  3. […] I saw that Google’s new experimental interfaces aren’t new no score link spread Science and Technology 1 minute ago by […]

  4. […] Google Copied My Ideas I have been writing search articles since November 2006 and as a search engineer it helps me to construct my thoughts […] […]

  5. New Look Google, but no Surprises

    The changes to Google announced on Wednesday at the Searchology day constitute the single largest update to the search giant ever, but was any of it that surprising?

  6. Good ideas are a dime a dozen. A single idea *implemented* properly is worth millions.

  7. Thomas McKenzie says:

    Google is lame. They rip off everybody. Google is over with.

  8. Phill says:

    Good ideas are a dime a dozen for sure, but Google shouldn’t be trading in good ideas, they should have excellent ideas surely? Like the original search engine they built.

    I don’t recall Google ripping people off Thomas, but my sarcasm detector is useless at this time of the morning :/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s